Identifying and Analyzing Judgment Opinions
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we introduce a methodology for analyzing judgment opinions. We define a judgment opinion as consisting of a valence, a holder, and a topic. We decompose the task of opinion analysis into four parts: 1) recognizing the opinion; 2) identifying the valence; 3) identifying the holder; and 4) identifying the topic. In this paper, we address the first three parts and evaluate our methodology using both intrinsic and extrinsic measures.
منابع مشابه
Identifying and Analyzing Key Factors Affecting Singleness in Iran
In the past decades, social structures and institutions, including families, have been transformed by phenomena such as modernism, globalization and the expansion of communication networks. Transformation in the pattern of marriage and the age of marriage is one of the domains affected by these changes. In Iran, delay in marriage and increased Singleness have increased in recent years. The pur...
متن کاملRealistic Opinion Aggregation Lehrer-Wagner with a Finite Set of Opinion Values
Opinion aggregation problems arise when a number of individuals express different opinions on some set of variables (the ‘agenda’) and we wish to combine them into a single consistent ‘collective’ opinion on each variable. General methods for solving problems of this kind have been extensively studied in different domains for instance in social choice theory, in statistics and in judgment aggre...
متن کاملIdentifying Opinion Holders for Question Answering in Opinion Texts
Question answering in opinion texts has so far mostly concentrated on the identification of opinions and on analyzing the sentiment expressed in opinions. In this paper, we address another important part of Question Answering (QA) in opinion texts: finding opinion holders. Holder identification is a central part of full opinion identification and can be used independently to answer several opin...
متن کاملComplexity Results for Aggregating Judgments using Scoring or Distance-Based Procedures
Judgment aggregation is an abstract framework for studying collective decision making by aggregating individual opinions on logically related issues. Important types of judgment aggregation methods are those of scoring and distance-based methods, many of which can be seen as generalisations of voting rules. An important question to investigate for judgment aggregation methods is how hard it is ...
متن کاملOnline Judgment in the Context of International and National Rules: Ethical and Legal Challenges
Background: Online judgment is an economical and faster way than the judicial one. With the development of technology in recent decades, it has also been possible to make judgments online. Although few countries have incorporated this approach into their laws, online judgments are being developed and implemented in various areas such as international trade or intellectual property. The pres...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006